5 Reasons to Watch Daily Caller Hooker Video

5 Reasons to Watch Daily Caller Hooker Video

Early this morning around 2 a.m. The Daily Caller posted their bombshell video of two Dominican hookers alleging to have had sex with U.S. Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.). Nothing like a Washington sex scandal to follow up a deadly hurricane. The whole thing was majorly hyped by Drudge around midnight, with Washington and New York journalists fighting to stay awake to see it. Reason magazine’s Nick Gillespie wrote, “Exit Q: is it worth staying up to see if The Daily Caller‘s big scoop is about Bob Menendez booty calls w prostitutes?” Some got fed up and hit the hay. And Instapundit snapped, “Good night Daily Caller. I stayed up until midnight, but your story didn’t appear. Sleep is more important. Next time less tease, please.” Others stayed up and tweeted about it well into the wee hours of the morning.

The senator has denied all charges as false.

Still, here we offer five reasons why you should bother watching the video in which a translator questions the prostitutes:

1. Breasts. Have you ever seen an interview where jiggling breasts were the focal point of a supposedly serious interview? It’s so ridiculous that it borders on fantastic, complete with a fat, white balloon type image sort of covering the woman’s face. For comical purposes, the only improvement we can see is if they’d distorted and disguised the woman’s voices.

2. The translator’s English is amazing. And by amazing we mean that we love translators who can speak Spanglish and pronounce English words with thick Spanish accents. It makes the interviews that much more powerful. (“She was prrrromised $500 and was only given one hundrrred.”) He’s so good even El Bloombito (New York Mayor Bloomberg’s Twitter alias) might get jealous. If there is a God, SNL will spoof this.

3. Bra strap. Nothing spells out seriousness quite like a woman with a “Flashdance” style canary yellow top exposing a thick white bra strap. This was Hooker #2, who claimed to have had sex with the senator for an hour and a half.

4. Again, the translator. He’s a sly one, asking how the sex was and simultaneously trying to be sensitive to the women. He asks them things like, “How was it?” And “How was the senator, romantico or no?” In other words, was the hooker sex romantic? Was the senator friendly? Hooker #2 essentially says Menendez was friendly, had sex with her and then stopped caring. Seriously, somewhere between the sex and the $100 fee he stopped being tender. What, no cuddling?

5. Impossible to resist. Come on, when does a Washington sex scandal stop being entertaining? Just about never.

Source : mediabistro.com - http://www.mediabistro.com

Related searches: Nick Gillespie, Daily Caller,