WELCOME TO USA DAILY HOT SEARCHES

WE COLLECT DAILY HOT SEARCHES IN UNITED STATES

USA DAILY HOT SEARCHES

YOU WILL FIND HERE WHAT THE US SEARCHING FOR

Showing posts with label Article. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Article. Show all posts

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Andy Kaufman still alive, claims 'daughter'

Andy Kaufman still alive, claims 'daughter'




Comedian Andy Kaufman, who died nearly 30 years ago, is still alive – that's according to a 24-year-old woman claiming to be his daughter.

She says her father faked his own death in 1984 to be a stay-at-home dad.

More a performance artist than a comedian, Kaufman wanted his audiences to question reality.

The entertainer died suddenly from cancer in 1984, but ever since there have been rumours that his death was an elaborate hoax.


At the annual Kaufman Awards this week  his brother Michael brought along a young woman, who told the crowds she was Andy Kaufman's daughter and that her father is still alive.

It's not the first time someone has claimed Kaufman as their father.

One story was that his long-lost son tracked him down in Albuquerque and posted a video online after Kaufman shunned him.  Whoever posted the video claims the footage shows Kaufman walking through a parking lot in New Mexico.

But the latest claims by the woman calling herself Andy Kaufman's daughter are by far the strongest.

She even said he had considered going to the awards that night - but backed out at the last minute.


Source : http://www.3news.co.nz

Monday, August 12, 2013

‘Breaking Bad’ Creator Vince Gilligan Spills on the Midseason Premiere’s Big Plot Twist

‘Breaking Bad’ Creator Vince Gilligan Spills on the Midseason Premiere’s Big Plot Twist


Breaking Bad took a shocking turn at the end of Sunday’s episode. Now viewers can’t wait to find out what happens next. Creator Vince Gilligan tells Andrew Romano what he was thinking—and hints at the “s**tload of story left to tell.”

If you haven't seen Sunday night's installment of Breaking Bad—the premiere episode of the second half of the final season—stop reading now. Something big and surprising happens at the end of the episode, and that's what this story is all about. I don't want to spoil it for you. Come back after you've caught up.

Now that we've weeded out the stragglers, let's talk.

Actors Aaron Paul and Bryan Cranston in a scene from the premiere of the second half of the fifth and final season of “Breaking Bad.” (Ursula Coyote/AMC)

Sunday's Breaking Bad premiere picked up right where last season left off: with detective Hank Schrader realizing on the toilet that his mild-mannered brother-in-law Walter White is actually Heisenberg, a murderous, meth-cooking criminal mastermind of epic proportions. It was like Ahab finally spotting his White whale.

What most viewers probably didn't expect was that Hank would decide to confront his mark—or that Walt would discover he was being hunted—anytime soon. I assumed that Hank would take his time—that his cat-and-mouse game with Walt would be a major part of the final season's overarching narrative. Ever the professional, Hank would observe, investigate, and wait for the perfect moment to spring his trap.

How wrong I was. After spending a few days in a state of strained, red-eyed shock—he calls in sick after plowing his car into a neighbor's yard—Hank decides to plant a GPS tracker on Walt's car.

Meanwhile, Walt is happily retired—until his cancer comes back. As he leans on the toilet between bouts of vomiting, he notices that his copy of Leaves of Grass is gone. Then Skyler tells him that Hank is working a case from home. Suspicions aroused, Walt walks outside and reaches under his bumper. Bingo. The tracker.

This sets up the remarkable encounter at the end of the episode. Walt stops by Hank's house. He's officially there to check up on Hank's “illness,” but his real purpose is to detect if Hank is on to him. He seems to be. Walt is dismayed. He turns to leave. Then he reconsiders. He stops. He pulls the GPS tracker from his pocket. And he asks Hank point-blank if he's under investigation.


‘Once this thing gets going, and it gets going very quickly, as you’ve seen, it just rolls along like gangbusters.’
Seconds later, the garage door is closed and Hank is slamming Walt up against it, accusing him of being Heisenberg.

Words can't really do the scene justice. It is one of the richest, saddest, and most expertly executed in the history of Breaking Bad. As Hank, Dean Norris hovers somewhere between a sob and a dropkick, blending shock, betrayal, rage, and despair in equal, utterly believable measure. And Bryan Cranston is immaculate as usual. When he shifted in the episode's final line from "a dying man who runs a car wash" to a crime lord threatening Hank—"If that's true, if you don't know who I am," he hissed, "then maybe your best course would be to tread lightly"—I got the chills.

Wanting to know more about how the scene developed—and how the coming episodes will build on Sunday's turbocharged start—I gave series creator Vince Gilligan a call. He was gracious enough to take me behind the scenes and explain exactly what he and his team were thinking.

Below are edited excerpts of our conversation.

The Daily Beast: Were the two halves of Season 5 written separately, or was it all one arc? Did you have to come back to the writer’s room after writing the episodes we saw last year and figure out how to start the final half-season?

Vince Gilligan: We did indeed break them in half. We did not write them straight through. We took a little break of a month or two, and we thought at the end of our first eight that we would have an easy road ahead of us—that it would kind of write itself. But then we got back for the final eight and were like, oh shit. It was really hard.

130810-breaking-bad-romano-tease
Frank Ockenfels 3/AMC

The final scene of the last season was Hank finding Leaves of Grass and realizing that Walt was W.W. What were your options at that point?

What’s funny about it is that we thought our options were limited. In a good way—in a way that was going to make life easier for my six writers and myself. We thought that the story path to the finale would be very clear to us. Very well limned. But unfortunately when we got back we realized this could go literally a thousand different ways. What were we thinking?

It seems like we have a few major confrontations awaiting us in this final season: Walt and Hank, Walt and Jesse, and perhaps Walt and his cancer. Let’s talk about Walt and Hank first. Walk me through the process of deciding to have them confront each other so early in the season.

We knew when we got to the end of the first half of the season that Hank is onto Walt now. He’s sitting on the toilet. He’s reading Leaves of Grass. But then it’s like, what is Hank’s next move? Does he keep it secret? Does he go outside and just shoot Walt in the head? There are a hundred decisions right from the get-go. Then the question is, if Hank starts researching and investigating Walt, when does Walt find out that Hank’s on to him?

Everyone who sees that first episode says to me, “My God. I didn’t think these guys would come to a confrontation so quickly.” And the funny thing is, we didn’t either. The writers and I, just like the viewers, we all said, “When Hank and Walt are nose to nose and toe to toe here, and Hank is accusing Walt of being Heisenberg, when does that come? Is that the very final episode? Well, it can’t be the final episode. Is it midway through the final eight? When is it?” That’s a surprisingly hard part of the job—figuring out how to portion out plot. We’ve spent thousands of man-hours struggling with those very questions.

I thought you were going to withhold that confrontation for much longer. That would have been the standard thing to do—to have Hank trailing Walt without Walt's knowledge and slowly piecing it all together.

In our initial breakdown, we had it broken up into eight equally sized squares; you know, what’s going to happen where in these final eight episodes. And in our first version we thought that Walt wouldn’t know that Hank was onto him until about the halfway point.

But as we talked about it, the more we realized: nope, it needs to be in the first one. Because we've got a shitload of story left to tell. And we’ve only got seven more episodes after this one in which to tell it. So we’d better make hay while the sun is shining.

That's why these final eight episodes move faster than any stretch of eight episodes that we’ve ever had in the history of the show. Once this thing gets going, and it gets going very quickly, as you’ve seen, it just rolls along like gangbusters. It has to because we’ve got so little time left.

It seems like Walt and Hank are heading for some sort of uneasy truce, which is much more interesting as a viewer than just waiting around for the inevitable confrontation.

Yeah. Well, it may seem that way, and maybe that’s where we’re heading—or maybe it isn’t [laughs].

How about the scene itself? I thought Dean Norris and Bryan Cranston were absolutely at the top of their game. Was it hard to strike the right tone—that mixture of shock and sadness and rage and menace?

I tell you, that’s all credit to the actors. Some scenes are harder to write than to act, and some scenes are the opposite. This is a good example of the latter. It’s one thing to write that "Hank reacts with a mixture of outrage and anger and sadness and betrayal"... you can put all those descriptors into a paragraph of writing, but it’s much harder for an actor to find that mix and communicate it to the audience in as few words of dialogue as possible.

And damned if Dean Norris didn’t accomplish that. He played that scene so beautifully. I think it’s one of the finest scenes he’s ever played for us. He and Bryan, who directed the episode, took what on the page is easy to communicate intellectually and they translated it into something the audience can feel viscerally. It’s a real magic trick, and I’m not quite sure they how managed to pull it off. But they did indeed. 

You've said that Breaking Bad is a show about one man's transformation from Mr. Chips to Scarface. Is Walt entirely Scarface now? How much Mr. Chips is left?

That’s an interesting question. I think Walt was his closest to being entirely Scarface—or entirely Heisenberg, to be more accurate—at some of those low moments of high drama in the first half of Season 5, and maybe at the end of Season 4. I think he’s a man in retirement now, when we meet with him in this first episode. He wants to be a car wash owner. He wants to beat his cancer. And I think when he realizes Hank is onto him, and he says that great dialogue that Peter Gould wrote—“My right hand to God. I’m just a guy who owns a car wash who’s dying of cancer. That’s all I am. What’s the point of coming after me?”—I think as smart as Walter White is, he is truly bewildered by why a family member, a man that he loves, who ostensibly loves him, or used to love him, would come after him so vehemently. It doesn’t quite compute for him, at least in my estimation.

He ends that moment as Heisenberg, when he says, “My advice would be to tread lightly.” But I think up until that moment, he doesn’t really want to be Heisenberg any more. He’s done it. He’s accomplished it. He’s built his empire. Now he just wants to hold on to his empire, or what’s left of it—the spoils of it. And he wants more than anything now for his family to love him, to be in a state of affection for him, when he finally succumbs to cancer, whenever that may occur. And this is a really terrible development, because it puts all of that in danger.

I have a suspicion that Walt might not get his wish there. Why did you decide to have his cancer come back, and how much of a role is it going to play this season? It’s been on the backburner for a while now.

It has been on the backburner. But my writers and I don’t like leaving loose ends. Cancer was the plot engine that got this whole story going in the first place, and it felt wrong to us to not address it again. It felt proper and fitting to us that it might rear its ugly head yet again.

And as you can imagine, with a plot development like that, it only complicates matters. It makes the morality of the story more complex in the sense that Walt has a point. It’s very much a villain’s point of view, but it’s a point nonetheless when he says, “Look, I’m dying of cancer. I’m never going to see the inside of a jail cell. Why do this thing, Hank? Why ruin our family?” It’s kind of a douche bag point, but it has validity nonetheless. We love those kinds of story complications, and that’s as good a reason as any to bring his cancer back.

How about Jesse? In Sunday's episode we saw him weeping, wracked with guilt, and trying to give away the millions he earned in the meth business. He has always been the moral center of the show. Will he continue in that role to the end? I've always thought the final confrontation would be between him and Walt.

Jesse is not fit for the meth business, and I think we all know that. If we didn’t know that before, we know it now. He’s got too finely tuned a sense of morality to be a criminal. It was a mistake for him to be a criminal from the get-go.

And to be fair to Walt, Walt didn’t start Jesse down the path of cooking crystal meth. Jesse was already doing that regardless. But Walt made his life so much worse. And that’s one of Walt’s unforgivable sins, and one of the deep sadnesses of the show: that Jesse didn’t have a better mentor than Mr. White. He didn’t have this man tell him “you deserve better than this.”

And now we’re at a point where Jesse just can’t live with the consequences of his actions. He’s got this terrible guilt that will not be ameliorated. He tries to give away this blood money, as he calls it, and indeed, that’s the name of the episode. But nothing seems to help. It just won’t be expunged. It won’t go away.

Like The Daily Beast on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for updates all day long.

Andrew Romano is a senior writer for Newsweek and The Daily Beast. He reports on politics, culture, and food. His 2008 campaign blog, Stumper, won MINOnline’s Best Consumer Blog award and was cited as one of the cycle’s best news blogs by both Editor & Publisher and the Deadline Club of New York. Follow Andrew on Twitter.


Source : http://www.thedailybeast.com

Saturday, August 3, 2013

Huppke: A (largely fabricated) guide to Lollapalooza

Huppke: A (largely fabricated) guide to Lollapalooza

I've been appointed by my newspaper -- which, for those of you who don't know, is like a very retro blog -- to guide you through the history and highlights of this annual lakeshore musicgasm.



Welcome, everyone, to Lollapalooza, a three-day summer music festival that draws throngs of young people who are cool and throngs of older people who think they are cool but are mistaken to Chicago's iconic Grant Park for a weekend of intense perspiration and regret.

Because I am "in my 40s" and "have a job," I don't technically fit into the Lolla demographic. Nonetheless, I've been appointed by my newspaper — which, for those of you who don't know, is like a very retro blog — to guide you through the history and highlights of this annual lakeshore musicgasm.


Unfortunately, I got to this assignment a bit late because I was busy disliking the band Mumford & Sons. So I'll have to rely on my keen knowledge of pop culture, some educated guesses and what we in the journalism biz call "outright fabrications."

Let's begin with some history. The word "Lollapalooza" is actually a fusion of two Greek words — "lollagopolous," which means "standing uncomfortably close to," and "paloozaklava," which means "people who have dreadful facial hair."

The first event was held in 1936, when a group of Depression-era hobos with unkempt beards gathered in Grant Park to share a surprisingly pristine potato they had found in a trash bin on Michigan Avenue. It's said that one of the men, known as Grizzly Bear Thompson, was so pleased with the meal that he broke into a long, guttural, drunken moan, and Lollapalooza was born. (In Thompson's honor, a band called Grizzly Bear is playing at this weekend's festival.)

Hobos carried on the event for many decades, but it was slowly taken over by concert organizers eager to bring music to the masses with the help of independent mom-and-pop businesses like Toyota, Red Bull, Bud Light and Samsung.

The annual gathering now draws about 18 billion people to Grant Park and attracts hugely popular bands like The Lumineers, Kendrick Lamar, Vampire Weekend and the 237-member alt-country/belching fusion band Uncle Constantine & the Fraggled Yardslaws.

But Lollapalooza has become more than just music. It's an immersive experience that includes food, fun and seeing a side of that guy from the IT department you'll never be able to un-see.

You can grab some earthy grub at Chow Town North or Chow Town South, choosing from a wide array of eco-friendly vegan dishes like "bacon sausage on a stick" and "rib eye steak sandwich." Or saunter over to the Farmers Market, because nothing amps up the fun at an hourslong music festival like carrying around a bag of fresh-cut kale.

Once your belly's full, head to Lolla Cares and check out booth after booth of grass-roots organizations. You'll be inspired to end poverty or raise political consciousness for at least five to 10 minutes, after which you can race over to Green Street — Lollapalooza's shopping district — for a little cleansing capitalism.

If you've got the kids in tow, don't miss Kidzapalooza, a fun-filled area where impressionable youths can engage in faux-risky behavior like getting a tattoo at Tattooz or a pink mohawk at Funky Hairdooz or a candy-filled bong at Doobeeeeeez.

But, of course, music is the centerpiece, and it will be pouring from speakers on stages scattered across Grant Park. There's the Petrillo Stage, the Lake Shore Stage, the National Association for Premature Hearing Loss Stage.


Between sets, fans can get autographs from their favorite bands, including Frightened Rabbit, Terrified Antelope and Extremely Worried Badger.

Other perks that come with the three-day pass, which costs $235 and prohibits holders from wearing deodorant, are:

•Complimentary skateboard parking.

•Access to a hipsters-only eye-rolling section.

•Free workshops, including "How to Hone Your Dreadful, Self-Absorbed Poetry" and "Sulking: Why You Should Do It More."

•Souvenir Lollapalooza hand towel, perfect for drying off the sweaty, shirtless guy dancing frenetically next to you throughout the entire Nine Inch Nails set.

For those of you unable to get tickets, the best way to create your own Lollapalooza is to put on a good pair of headphones, cue up an album by The Killers, go out in the sun and wedge yourself between two large steaks heated to about 99 degrees. Then stand there for eight hours and wish you were somewhere else.

Happy Lollapalooza, everyone! Rock on!


Source : http://articles.chicagotribune.com/

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

‘The Bachelorette’ recap: Dramatic exit, bombshell confession in part 1 of season finale

‘The Bachelorette’ recap: Dramatic exit, bombshell confession in part 1 of season finale






he producers of “The Bachelorette” decided to drag out the finale into two weeks, but after a shocking exit in Antigua during last night’s episode, it looks as though it may be worth it.
The week—also known as Fantasy Suite Week—started off quite normally.  Bachelorette Desiree Hartsock took Drew Kenney to a local festival in Antigua for some dancing and shopping, before offering him the chance to spend the night alone with her without any cameras—a “Bachelorette” tradition when it is down to three suitors.
“I’m ecstatic,” Drew said. “I don’t want to ever give up time with you.”
Des then took Chris Siegfried on a helicopter ride to nearby Barbuda Island for some fun in the sun.
His answer to the Fantasy Suite proposal?  “I think that it’s a great opportunity to spend more time with you.”
At this point, instead of cutting to the beginning of Brooks Forester’s tropical date, confused viewers watched an extended scene from his hometown date in Utah last week, shortly after Brooks said goodbye to Des.
An obviously upset and conflicted Brooks told his family that he was having some doubts.
“I love my relationship with Desiree and I keep wondering why it is that I’m not at the stage yet to say to Desiree, ‘I love you.’” he said. “The idea of proposing to her at the end of this makes me really uncomfortable.”
Uh oh.
In an almost cruel parallel testimonial, Des dished about how excited she was for her date with Brooks.
“Even though I’m falling in love with the other guys, I still have deeper feelings for Brooks,” she said. “I know that I am falling in love with him.”
After arriving in Antigua, Brooks invited Chris Harrison over to talk.
“I don’t feel like I’ll regret this…I think I’ve come to a conclusion where I don’t think that Des is the love of my life,” Brooks told the host. “I gave it everything that I had and I love so many things about Desiree, but I’m not in love with her.”
Meanwhile, Des is telling the camera, “I’m in love with Brooks and I miss him every day that I’m not with him.”
Brooks finally headed to the beach to meet an excited Des.  Her smile quickly faded, though, after seeing his gloomy expression.
Brooks took Des to the dock and proceeded to do a lot of rambling.  Des quickly understood what Brooks was getting at and her eyes filled up with tears.
“I know what you’re going to say,” she said sobbing.
“It takes me a while when I see you again to remember what we have,” Brooks said trying to explain himself.  “I feel like I lose it.”
Des managed to choke out a “Why now?” to which Brooks responded that he always felt he needed more time, so waited to make his decision.
“I don’t feel like the moments apart are hard enough,” he said.
In another bombshell, Des admitted something that most Bachelorettes don’t until the end of the finale—that she is indeed in love with Brooks.
“I love you, I do,” Des said through tears. “You’re the only one that I could say that to.  It sucks because for once in my life I was hopeful.  It just sucks that I loved you.  I do love you, regardless.”
Des confessed that she felt conflicted because she immediately developed feelings for Brooks and wanted to go on dates with him over other men.
“I didn’t want to share my heart, I wanted to give it to you,” she said.
After several more minutes of crying, Des walked Brooks out and then hysterically fled back to the dock.
Brooks couldn’t make himself leave right away, so he stayed and paced back and forth.
“This is the worst day of my life,” he said. “This is way worse than I thought this was going to be.”
“This throws everything off, having Brooks gone,” Des said. “It breaks my heart. I just can’t love [Drew and Chris] as much as they love me and that’s not what they deserve. Honestly, for me it’s over.”
Wow.


Source : http://www.foxnews.com/

Saturday, July 20, 2013

5 ways to get fit with Facebook, Pinterest, and more

5 ways to get fit with Facebook, Pinterest, and more



I have to admit, I was reluctant to join Pinterest, I’m still a newbie on Instagram and I barely understand how to use my Google+ account. Each time a new social media platform pops up, I think, “I’m already on Facebook and Twitter, how the heck will I have time for another site or app?” But then I catch a glimmer of how valuable it can be, for both my clients and myself, and I sign up! If you haven’t yet embraced the health benefits of social media, here are five reasons to tech up, and get connected.
Find tips, recipes, and healthy info
The first night I joined Pinterest I was up half the evening creating boards, uploading photos, and pinning away. I’m a visual person, so I love the eye candy, but Pinterest is also overflowing with practical resources. I love pins like these on which fruits and veggies are in season, the basics of herbs, and how to cut an onion, and the site is also a clearinghouse for thousands of healthy recipes, eating plans, fitness programs, and inspirational quotes. I also find tons of amazing healthy resources through Facebook, like Greatist’s 44 healthy foods under $1, and this awesome pumpkin smoothie recipe from Artisana Foods. 
Social media is also a great way to access experts you wouldn’t have the chance to meet in person. I do a live Q&A every other Thursday on Health’s Facebook page, and personally respond to each question and comment posted on my own page. I’ve also participated in several Twitter chats, and I just found out about Google+ “hangouts,” which I can’t wait to try. Here’s one, archived on YouTube, hosted by Kelly Ripa, featuring Michelle Obama and others, talking about fit families.
Health.com: Popular Spring Workouts on Pinterest
Fall in love with healthy food
We eat with our eyes as well as our stomachs, and platforms like Instagram and Pinterest have helped make healthy food mouth wateringly can’t-wait-to-eat enticing. Check out these roasted cabbage wedges, raw organic vegan Caesar salad, and frozen cherimoya fruit. Social media can introduce you to delicious ways to eat healthy foods you may not have thought about, or didn’t know could be so appealing, like adding avocado to a smoothie, or stirring chia seeds into your H2O.
Stay healthy on the road
One of my favorite things about social media is being able to instantly connect with people across the country and around the globe. I split my time between New York City and Los Angeles, but when I travel to other cities, I can post a quick note on Facebook or Twitter or check Yelp to find healthy restaurant suggestions, local fitness classes, and farmer’s markets. That’s how I found out about some great places, like The Plant Café in San Fran and Casa De Luz in Austin. I’m also happy to share my favorites with anyone who’ll be visiting the Big Apple or the City of Angels, like the amazing Union Square Greenmarket in NYC, and incredible LA hikes.
Health.com: Lose Weight and Get Fit with Your Phone
Declare your healthy intentions
Through social media, posting pics of what or where we eat, and what we do in our “leisure time” is part of how we define ourselves these days. I’ve had numerous clients use social media as a way of declaring their healthy goals, and letting others know that they’re striving to live a balanced, active life. You don’t have to become an evangelist, or record every minute of your life, but using social media to and “put yourself out there” in a healthy way can be a fantastic strategy for staying connected to your wellness goals.
Health.com: How-To Find Good Health Information Online
Secure support
One of my favorite things about social media is its ability to create communities and foster support. At times, especially after my latest book came out, I’ve felt like my Facebook page served as a mini support group, and I loved it. People who adopted my eating plan shared their progress and results, posted pics of their meals, cheered each other on, and shared tips and tricks for everything from dining out to coping with unsupportive family members. In my experience, the latter is key. 
In my private practice, I’ve worked with numerous clients who are incredibly enthusiastic about transforming their eating habits, who struggle with a lack of support from their significant others, co-workers, and friends. When that’s the case, connecting with like-minded people on Facebook can be the only thing that prevents you from throwing in the towel, a pretty powerful benefit!
Cynthia Sass is a registered dietitian with master’s degrees in both nutrition science and public health. Frequently seen on national TV, she’s Health’s contributing nutrition editor, and privately counsels clients in New York, Los Angeles, and long distance. Cynthia is currently the sports nutrition consultant to the New York Rangers NHL team and the Tampa Bay Rays MLB team, and is board certified as a specialist in sports dietetics. Her latest New York Times best seller is S.A.S.S! Yourself Slim: Conquer Cravings, Drop Pounds and Lose Inches


Source : http://www.foxnews.com/

Kate Middleton embraces her royal roles

Kate Middleton embraces her royal roles

NICOLAS ASFOURI/AFP/GETTY IMAGES -  Catherine, the Duchess of Cambridge, in September 2012.


Autumn Brewington is editor of The Post’s op-ed page. She started and anchored The Post’s Royal Wedding Watch blog during the engagement of Prince William and Kate Middleton.

As of Wednesday, 78-year-old Terry Hutt had slept outside St. Mary’s Hospital for seven nights. He has been photographed in his Union Jack T-shirt, shorts and hat, under his Union Jack umbrella, holding handmade signs. He is participating in the #GreatKateWait, anticipating the arrival of Britain’s next prince or princess (if more enthusiastically than most).

Those of us not stalk- . . . er, staring in person at the maternity ward of the London hospital designated to deliver the first child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge — better known as Prince William and Kate Middleton — have relied on the media circus outside, which has produced such voyeuristic aids as the Sun’s Royal Baby Monitor, a live stream of “all the comings and goings into and out of the Lindo Wing,” and Web and phone apps that combine live updates with royal and Middleton family histories.


The weeks-long Royal Baby Watch, punctuated by speculation that the duchess has in fact gone into labor or will be sneaked into another hospital, has engaged even the most eminent of relatives. In response to a child’s question this week about whether she preferred a great-grandson or great-granddaughter, Queen Elizabeth II remarked: “I don’t think I mind.” Then the sovereign noted: “I would very much like it to arrive. I’m going on holiday. No sign yet.”

Kate Middleton is giving birth to a future British monarch.

We love her for this.

We love her for everything — even if we don’t always think about why.

During William and Kate’s years-long courtship, media coverage of the couple included intense speculation that Kate, a commoner by birth, might not have been a suitable partner for the future king. For Americans, it is easy to view the couple’s narrative in fairy-tale terms: Ordinary girl marries tall, handsome prince, leveling society’s class system. This makes sense when one gets to appreciate the monarchy’s pomp, circumstance and bling without any of its expense or constitutional details.

But that story line is not quite right. Kate might not have been aristocracy, but neither was she the typical girl next door. The daughter of self-made millionaires, she had flexible hours working for her parents’ party-supply business, or not working, which allowed her to focus her life around her prince. And William and Kate’s popularity ensures the continuation of the monarchy — reinforcing, not eliminating, Britain’s class system.

Kate and William radiate an ordinariness that endears them and the monarchy to their future subjects. He grew up standing in line at amusement parks and McDonald’s because his mother, Diana, the late Princess of Wales, wanted him to understand life beyond the palace walls. His wife is the first future queen to consistently shop off the rack, enabling copy-Kates the world over to emulate her style. They go to movies and meals out — all of which makes them feel accessible, in the tradition of Diana, the “people’s princess.” We feel welcome to continue calling her Kate, despite all the palace fuss about Catherine, the Duchess of Cambridge. Even the publication of nude photos of the duchess last fall — the sort of scandal that blacklisted a royal just a generation ago — sparked more sympathy for the couple than criticism.

There are signs of modernization: After the “wedding of the century” in 2011, Britain and the commonwealth countries updated their laws of succession, which had favored male heirs. Whatever the baby’s gender, the first Prince or Princess of Cambridge will be third in line to the throne (bumping Uncle Prince Harry down to fourth). The baby’s birth will be announced on Twitter and posted on a gilded easel at the Buckingham Palace gates.

But for all the talk of William and Kate as modern young royals, they have clearly fallen into step with centuries-old traditions. Kate might have allegedly joked while they were dating that the prince was lucky to be going out with her. But she has embraced an extremely traditional role, with her life largely defined by her marriage, man and family. She is a happy homemaker, shopping for groceries, cooking dinner and reportedly even making her own jam, which she gives out as gifts. She has taken to royal life with aplomb, rarely putting a (perfectly shod) foot wrong, even in the glare of unprecedented media coverage. It is a supporting role in which she is seen and rarely heard.

On a certain level, the #GreatKateWait is the product of a popular illusion. Dazzled by a beautiful couple, people see youth and presume fresh thinking and 21st-century mores. But this is not a modern partnership of equals. People may toast the next generation — more than $90 million is forecast to be spent on alcohol alone as part of royal baby celebrations — but underneath the glamour, William and Kate’s relationship is as traditional as the monarchy he is destined to lead.


Source : http://www.washingtonpost.com/

Monday, July 15, 2013

Carly Rae Jepsen's First Pitch at Rays Game Goes ... Astray

Carly Rae Jepsen's First Pitch at Rays Game Goes ... Astray



Carly Rae Jepsen is usually pitch perfect. But the "Call Me Maybe" singer's first pitch Sunday night at a Tampa Bay Rays home game needed a little work. 

As seen in a video that is currently trending like crazy, it all went wrong with the wind-up and release. 



As a result, once Jepsen pitched, the ball never crossed home plate. Instead, it slowly rolled across the first-base line before hitting a camera. 

Jepsen, 27, certainly had a great sense of humor about it, covering her face, laughing and throwing her hands in the air. 

She even posted a series of photos of the terrible toss on Instagram, stating, "A before and after. Me taking the mound. Me knocking the camera out of the photographers hands with the baseball. And me getting a sympathy hug from the catcher. Omg." 

To Jepsen's credit, the diminutive singer tossed a strike in April when she threw the ceremonial first pitch at a Baltimore Orioles game, according to the Baltimore Sports Report. 

Despite the ominous start to Sunday night's game, the Rays went on to beat the Houston Astros 5-0.

Source : http://www.people.com/

Related searches: Carly Rae Jepsen

WWE Money in the Bank 2013: 5 Losers Who Won Big

WWE Money in the Bank 2013: 5 Losers Who Won Big



Even though the focus seems to be on Damien Sandow, Randy Orton, John Cena and Alberto Del Rio, that does not necessarily mean that they were the only wrestlers to make it out of WWE's Money in the Bank 2013 pay-per-view looking good.

In fact, there are five other superstars who are in a much better spot in their careers than possibly ever before, despite the fact that they came out on the losing end at this event.

They may not have won gold or anything of the sort, but these following people stood out in some significant way that will pay off in the future. Let's take a look.


Cody Rhodes



The other half of Team Rhodes Scholars is walking out with the Money in the Bank briefcase, but the true star of this match ended up being Cody Rhodes.

Before this match took place, Rhodes was so far out of the limelight that the most he had done in the past few months was act as the loser sidekick to Sandow while he was feuding with Sheamus.

Sometime during this match, however, Rhodes became the fan favorite, surpassing even Dean Ambrose as far as the pops went. People started to buy into the idea that not only was Rhodes going to win the match, but that he deserved it as well.

The commentary team did a good job putting that idea over, as if the crowd reaction wasn't good enough to showcase it.

Look out for Rhodes to get a renewed push after he turns face, possibly on this next episode of Raw, which could lead to a United States or Intercontinental Championship reign, if not more.

Dolph Ziggler



Dolph Ziggler just can't catch a break, can he?

After two World Heavyweight Championship reigns that are nothing more than hiccups, many were expecting Ziggler to win here and start his true run.

Sadly, they were mistaken, which is causing a lot of people to think that this is a sign of WWE losing faith in the Show-Off.

I would argue that this is quite the opposite. The way Ziggler was booked in this match made him come off not as weaker or even equal to Alberto Del Rio, but better.

The only reason that he lost was because of the interference by AJ Lee, who will be dropped from association with Ziggler on Raw for sure. This will lead to a more solidified face turn that will help those fans who are confused about whether or not they should cheer for Ziggler and finally get on board.

Ziggler may end up winning the title at SummerSlam or perhaps even Night of Champions, but nonetheless, he will end up holding that strap once more. The reaction he gets on a regular basis was showcased once again at this event, as was his in-ring ability.

Del Rio may have won this match, just the same as he won their previous encounter, but both times, the only person being talked about is Ziggler. WWE can't ignore that.

Mark Henry



Just listen to the pop that Mark Henry received when he made his entrance. Now, in comparison, listen to the reaction that John Cena had.

That should not be a surprise, as Philadelphia is one of the areas that tends to support heels and Internet Wrestling Community favorites while also disliking Cena.

However, two things that are worth noting about this reaction are the energy and the message.

Fans were very excited when it appeared as though Henry would win. And they were excited from the beginning of the match, meaning that it wasn't just a response to a potential title change. Rather, the audience legitimately just got pumped with the idea of Henry himself winning.

Also, if Cena is being booed against someone that doesn't matter much to the crowd, you will normally hear the majority of the chants being directed against Cena instead of for his opponent. "Let's go Cena" will be the chant from his fans, while everyone else will cheer "Cena sucks."

In that scenario, the opponent isn't being cheered—he is just receiving a backlash positive wave from direct association of someone being booed. When fans are chanting for Henry, that's a different story.

Henry may not end up with the WWE Championship around his waist any time soon, but the success of this angle and the response he received at Money in the Bank will surely go a long way in convincing the powers that be in WWE to give him something significant to do after this—if not only to continue riding the momentum.

Daniel Bryan



Daniel Bryan may have been nearly everyone's favorite to win the ladder match and become a two-time Mr. Money in the Bank, but the results speak otherwise.

Still, Bryan continued to steal the show and defy the odds.

In a match that includes a popular wrestler's return in Rob Van Dam, a big brute in Sheamus, the best in the world in CM Punk and others, the smallest man in the fight was clearing house for quite a while.

Bryan had an entire section of the match dedicated to making him look strong, which is much more than someone like Christian can say for himself.

According to Wrestling Observer Newsletter (h/t WrestlingInc.com's Marc Middleton), rumors have circulated for some time that Bryan will face John Cena for the WWE Championship at SummerSlam. If this indeed does take place, not winning the Money in the Bank contract means that Bryan will earn his title shot the hard way, which means that much more in the long run.

WWE Creative knows how bright Bryan's star is shining right now, more than ever after his performance in this match. It's only a matter of time before those fans who were giving him a huge reaction during his entrance are able to chant "yes" when he wins the big one.

CM Punk



CM Punk's big win at Money in the Bank is a combination of what we saw with Rhodes and Ziggler.

With Paul Heyman turning on him, this will solidify his babyface turn, allowing WWE to push him in a much clearer direction and in such a way that fans can get behind the "best in the world."

This will also undoubtedly lead to a match with Brock Lesnar at SummerSlam. There's no step down from losing the Money in the Bank ladder match to being in the main event with someone who has only wrestled four matches since his return to the company.

Punk's storyline is going to be one of the biggest storylines going into what is supposed to be the second-biggest pay-per-view event of the year, so in a way, he failed upward.

Which people do you think had a good night, even if they were on the losing end of a match? Do you think Ryback is on his way back to the top now that he's won his first pay-per-view match in a year? Are The Usos a more credible tag team after their loss to The Shield?

Tell us your thoughts in the comments below!

Anthony Mango is the owner-operator of the wrestling website Smark Out Moment as well as the host of its YouTube podcast show Smack Talk. You can follow him on Twitter and Facebook for more.

John Cena



WWE Champion John Cena certainly had his hands full with the 412-lb. "World's Strongest Man" Mark Henry on Sunday night at Money in the Bank, but he may have truly met his match during a friendly sumo competition against former New York Giants defensive end Michael Strahan on Live with Kelly and Michael on Monday morning. 

Source : http://bleacherreport.com/

Related searches: money in the bank 2013, wwe money in the bank 2013

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Former 'Teen Mom' star Farrah Abraham enters rehab for alcohol abuse

Former 'Teen Mom' star Farrah Abraham enters rehab for alcohol abuse



Farrah Abraham, who went from reality TV personality to porn star with the release of her sex tape in May, voluntarily checked herself into a rehab facility, where she’ll seek treatment for alcohol abuse.
Abraham, a single mother of one, has entered an outpatient program to deal with alcohol abuse and to focus on her sobriety, the former "Teen Mom" star confirms.
PHOTOS: Farrah Abraham's raunchy photos leak online
“At this time in my life, I need to stay focused on the positive to get through all of the negative that a DUI has caused in my life. I’m 22 and I want to make better choices and ensure I can recognize when I am putting myself in a bad situation next time,” she told Radar Online.
The 22-year-old MTV star will undergo intensive counseling at The Lukens Institute in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, beginning on July 1. The treatment will last for 10 days and will cost Farrah more than $12,000, a source tells the site.
Farrah was arrested in Omaha, Nebraska in March, after allegedly having a blood alcohol level of .147, nearly twice the legal limit.
She was then placed on six months probation and ordered to complete an alcohol education course, which she has since passed. However, the director of the program said Farrah “had difficulty making eye contact, was standoffish and was sarcastic when answering the questions asked of her.”
During the out-patient treatment, Farrah is free to go about her daily life, but will be monitored by a sober companion.


Source : http://www.foxnews.com/

‘Independence Day’ premiered in 1996: Where is the cast now?

‘Independence Day’ premiered in 1996: Where is the cast now?



In 1996, they helped defend the world against a gnarly alien invasion in "Independence Day." After the film's premiere, many of the stars continued to score more great roles in movies, TV, and theater. In honor of the American holiday and one of the most epic White House demolition scenes, our friends at Snakkle caught up with the cast of “Independence Day” and find out what they’re up to now.... and who's STILL killing aliens.
Will Smith, Vivica A. Fox, and Ross Bagley
One morning, the world woke up to hundreds of aliens and a spacecraft parked over major cities. Captain Hiller (Smith) reassures girlfriend Jasmine (Fox) and her son (Bagley) that everything will be just fine. They will totally not need to run from a massive explosion and give medical assistance to the First Lady in a matter of hours!

Smith, Fox, and Bagley Today
Since “Independence Day,” Vivica A. Fox has gone on to roles in “Set It Off,” “Kill Bill: Vol. 1” and “Curb Your Enthusiasm.”
Ross Bagley has graced the small screen in “Providence”, and done voice over work for “The Wild Thornberrys” and “Judging Amy.”
And as for Smith? You may recognize him from his roles films like “Men in Black,” “I Am Legend,” and “After Earth.”
“Battleship” and More! Which Movies Were Based on Toys and Games?

Margaret Colin, Jeff Goldblum, and Judd Hirsch
As the brains behind the operation, David Levinson (Goldblum) cracked the alien code, impressing his father (Hirsch) and his ex-wife (Colin), and earning a sweet ride on Air Force One.
The Cast of “E.T.”—Where Are They Now?

Colin, Goldblum, and Hirsch Today
After the fictitious White House was destroyed, Press Secretary Margaret Colin got another gig playing Blair’s critical mother, Eleanor Waldorf, on TV’s “Gossip Girl.”
In addition to a recurring role on “Law & Order: CI,” Jeff Goldblum appeared in “The Switch" and “Morning Glory” and has graced the stage in London’s West End. He also completed a less-than-speedy lap as “Star in a Reasonably Priced Car” on the popular British series, “Top Gear.”
Judd Hirsch has gone on to star in George and Leo, and has appeared in “A Beautiful Mind,” “Numb3rs,” and the hit series “Damages.”


Source : http://www.foxnews.com/

Sunday, June 30, 2013

Release Date For iPhone 5S Predicted For September 20, Followed by Low-Cost iPhone 6

Release Date For iPhone 5S Predicted For September 20, Followed by Low-Cost iPhone 6



If You’re an iPhone user and you haven’t upgraded to a 5 yet, odds are, you’re sticking it out and waiting for the 5S. I’m in the same boat, realizing that iOS 7 will technically run on my iPhone 4, but barely. The good news is that we could be about 12 weeks away from the next iPhone.

The prediction of a September 20 release date (and a product announcement ten days earlier that will also include the September 18 release date of iOS 7) is being ventured by Dave Smith, technology editor for International Business Times. Here’s what it’s based on:

First, he assumes that iOS 7 will follow the pattern of iOS 6 and be released exactly 100 days after its announcement (that would be the September 18 date). Then he figures the new iPhone will follow by just two days, just as the iPhone 5 followed two days after iOS 6. Apple AAPL +0.68% does tend to follow these kinds of almost superstitious and numerological habits, so his math makes sense.

A bigger leap based on leaks and rumors concerns the low-cost iPhone 6 (or iPhone Light or whatever) that Smith goes on to predict will be released a week or two later (to avoid excess lines at the Apple stores.) Assuming the rumors are true and that leaked photos of brightly colored plastic iPhone casings are legit and not just unauthorized Chinese knockoffs, release dates of September 27 or October 4 sound plausible.

These supposedly colorful and inexpensive iPhone will be aimed primarily at the developing markets of China and India, but I think they will prove popular here as well. The preciousness of the standard iPhone casing is not actually a selling point for some users, particularly the young and butter-fingered! Now if they could work some smash-proof glass in there too that would be a real winner.

The other reason for the close coupling of these release dates, again according to Smith, is to make room later in October for another announcement, this time for a new full-size iPad and a retina iPad Mini—and maybe a new Apple TV and/or an iWatch—just in time for Christmas shopping.

The low-cost iPhone could do for Apple’s phone line what the iPad Mini has done for its tablet line. The lower price point, rather than the smaller size, is the thing that will convince incremental customers to join the Apple platform. The Apple TV, the iWatch and iOS in the car are the things that will extend that experience and give users ever more things to hook their iPhones up to.

If Apple can do all of this (or even most of it) and tune up the rough edges on iOS 7, the end of 2013 could prove to be a turn-around for Cupertino’s fortunes. But my needs are simple. I just want my iPhone 5S!


Source : http://www.forbes.com/

Friday, March 8, 2013

North Korea can't hit America, but South Korea and Japan in range

North Korea can't hit America, but South Korea and Japan in range




(Reuters) - North Korea has plenty of military firepower even if its threat this week of a pre-emptive nuclear strike on the United States is a hollow one, with South Korea most at risk from the isolated regime's artillery and rockets.

Japan, separated by less than 1,000 km (625 miles) of water and a frequent target of North Korea's ire, is also in easy range of Pyongyang's short- and mid-range missiles.

In pure numbers, North Korea's military looks formidable, much larger than the more affluent South in both personnel and equipment. The North's 1.2 million soldiers face off against 640,000 South Korean troops who are backed up by 26,000 U.S. personnel stationed in the country.

However, Pyongyang's capabilities are not what the figures would suggest. Impoverished North Korea has all but abandoned running a conventional military that can engage in sustained battle because of scare resources and has instead focused on nuclear weapons and ballistic missile technology, experts said.

"A conventional military is very costly, and overwhelmingly so for North Korea. It quickly becomes a money fight and North Korea cannot win that," said Shin In-kyun, head of the Korea Defence Network, an alliance of defence experts based in Seoul.

Nevertheless, a defence policy statement from South Korea in December noted that North Korea's frontline artillery pieces could launch a "sudden and massive" barrage on the capital Seoul, a mere 50 km (31 miles) from the Demilitarized Zone border that separates the two Koreas.

North Korea has around 12,000 artillery guns, many arrayed near the border. It also has an arsenal of intermediate range missiles in operational deployment, some of which can travel more than 3,000 km (1,875 miles). That puts South Korea and Japan in range as well as the U.S. territory of Guam.

"They have the capability to strike anywhere in the South and Japan," said Shin.

North Korea has also shown it has submarine capabilities.

In 2010, a North Korean submarine was widely believed to have sunk a South Korean naval vessel, killing 46 sailors. Pyongyang has denied it was behind the attack. In the same year, North Korea shelled a South Korean island in a disputed area, killing civilians.

One military expert said the North might be careful before launching another blatant attack, given Seoul has vowed to respond vigorously next time.

MAXIMUM CONFUSION

"The greatest realistic threat from North Korea is a type of attack that will create maximum confusion in the South but one that will be confusing as to who instigated it so that it will not invite immediate retaliation on Pyongyang," said Song Young-keun, a retired Army general who was once head of the intelligence arm of the South's military, the Defense Security Command.

Cyber warfare or a possible attack on the intricate communication and utility networks in the South could have just as much impact as any outright military action, Song said.

Outside its artillery and missiles, North Korea struggles to match the South.

Many of the soldiers that make North Korea the world's most heavily militarized state are poorly trained or even properly fed and are deployed in hard labor or farming to supplement the meager resources of their units.

The North's air force has more than 820 fighter jets, according to South Korea's Defence Ministry, but it does not have enough fuel to fly sorties or conduct needed drills to maintain combat effectiveness. South Korea has 460 jets.

North Korea has 4,200 tanks, according to South Korea, although Seoul's 2,400 are more modern and better maintained.

The question of North Korea's atomic capability was thrust to the headlines when Pyongyang on Thursday threatened the United States with a nuclear strike.

That came in the wake of accusations from Pyongyang that Washington was using military drills in South Korea as a launch pad for a nuclear war.

Experts say North Korea is years away from being able to hit continental America with a nuclear weapon despite a decades-long push toward an atomic capability.

The core of the North's unconventional military focus is a stockpile of fissile material that could be enough for six to eight nuclear weapons, and up to 5,000 metric tons of biological and chemical weapons that can wipe out a mid-size industrial city.

North Korea claims to have developed a miniaturized nuclear weapon while the launch of a long-range rocket in December that for the first time put an object into orbit indicated progress in its attempt to build an intercontinental nuclear missile.

"But for a weapons system to be viable, it has to be in production and deployed. I don't think we can say that about the Unha-3," Shin said, referring to the rocket launched on December 12.

Song said the general consensus was the North had yet to shrink a nuclear warhead to put on an intercontinental ballistic missile and more crucially there had been no tests to prove it has mastered the re-entry technology needed to bring a payload back into the atmosphere.

"It's hogwash, blackmail," Song said of Thursday's threat against the United States.

Source : http://www.reuters.com